The African Queen By Bradley Davis

Title/Year-The African Queen/1951

Director/Birth Country/Year Born-John Huston /USA/1906

Budget- $1,300,000

 Gross-$4,000,000 in US and Canada

Synopsis-In Africa during WW1, a gin-swilling riverboat owner/captain is persuaded by a strait-laced missionary to use his boat to attack an enemy warship.

Narrative and Visual Keywords-River boat,water, war,romance, adventure, comedy.

Characterization/ Dialogue-The African Queen is a sterling example of the kind of rollicking adventure that makes classic film enthusiasts pine for the old days. It has it all: action, comedy, and romance that unfold in a perfect synergy of plot, character, and dialogue. The film was deservedly nominated for four key Oscars

Camera/lighting/editing technique-Technicolor camera, bad special effects and script flaws.


Historical Relevance/ Recognition-Historical inaccuracies,The biggest problem I have with this film is, however, the lack of historical accuracy. The film suggests that Germans in East Africa at the start of WW1 had the upper hand, as well as intention and resources to conquer the whole continent, using the same brutal force and employing same methods as Nazis would use in WW2. Nothing could be farther from the truth. German colonies were scattered and isolated from mother country, manned by small garrisons and generally destined to be easily taken over by superior forces stationed in bordering Entente colonies

Notable Collaboration- John Huston and Humphrey Bogart. The Maltese Falcon-1941,The Treasure of the sierra madre-1948

Random fact, Etc-Humphrey Bogart won Academy Award for best actor for his role in The African Queen. Its was his only Academy Award.


Sources:WWW.answers.com
WWW.IMDb.com
WWW.Wikipedia.com

 1. Did you find any evidence of ineffective military leadership (associated with upper-class ineptitude) that is compensated for through hard work and commitment of the lowly infantryman? Yes, The German solders came into the village The commander with out speaking told the men to destroy the village and burn it to the ground. 

2. Does the film show a suffering soldier as a victim of war rather than exposing the structure of violence and presenting soldiers as elements in it? Or does it portray the soldier as a strong individual following codes of honor and duty How does the film achieve this point of view? It shows two people fighting against the German army.A man and a women trying to help out England and sink a ship. There code is one of patriotism, witch makes it there duty.

3. Does the film offer the audience the familiar pleasures of cinema – the romantic scenarios and melodramatic poses woven into a more direct and immediate sense of war?The river scene when the Germans where shooting at the boat. With out warning the boat went right off the rapids, when all hope was the lost,they made it through.After that they found them self embraced in a hug and almost kiss. The struggle they go through to get the boat on the lake gives the feeling that at any coast they must take care of the Germans.The two tried to sink a battle ship and there ship went down, they were captured by the Germans. They showed there love by getting married by the German Captain.

4. Is the enemy portrayed as neutral or through hysterical exaggerations of atrocity? The enemy in this film are the Germans. They come across as being evil in every scene, the music change makes you feel how bad the Germans are.

Doctor Zhivago (1965) by Kerry Kutzer

Title/Year: Doctor Zhivago (1965)

Director/Birth Country/Year Born: David Lean/England/1908

Budget: $11 Million

Gross: $111,721,910

Synopsis: Set against the back drop of the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia & WWI, Doctor Zhivago tells the story of Yuri Zhivago a Russian doctor/poet who's prosperous life is torn apart by revolution, war, and forbidden love.

Narrative and Visual Keywords: Family, war, revolution, romance, power shift, authority, excessive force, cold, strife, desperation, corruption, class warfare, heartbreak, death.

Character Arc: Yuri Zhivago lives a near perfect life until war sends him away from his family and into a forbidden romance with a married woman.  He struggles to stay faithful to his wife & family until he finally gives into his carnal desires.  Yuri fights for what he believes to be right and just in a world of chaos and turmoil.

Camera/lighting/editing technique: Big/epic shots, dramatic lighting/hard shadows, sweeping score, heavy dialogue

Political/ Social Commentary: The film focuses on the struggles of the upper class vs. the lower class people and the latter's revolution gain power over their country.  It also shows how ideals can change and power corrupting.

Historical Relevance/ Recognition: Won 5 out of the 10 Oscars it was nominated for in 1966 and is ranked #39 in AFI's 100 Greatest Films of the Last Century.

Notable Collaboration: Composer Maurice Jarre also composed the music for David Lean's Lawrence of Arabia (1962) and A Passage to India (1984).

Random fact, Etc.: Maurice Jarre's score for Doctor Zhivago was widely regarded as the film's best attribute.  Director David Lean, however, did not care for it calling it, "overly romantic.

Sources Cites:
http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=doctorzhivago.htm

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0059113/

Responce Questions:

1)  The whole back drop of this film revolves around the tension between the upper class in power and the lower class fighting for power.  There are a few scenes in the film in which this battle is portrayed.  Firstly, there is the scene showing the Bolshevik's peaceful march down the streets.  As they march they are brutally attacked by police without provocation.  The other is later in the film when the war is on.  We see a Russian officer attempt to spur his troops into battle to no avail.  It is only when Pasha, "one of them" if you will, jumps up and urges his fellow comrades to join him, that the troops move.  These scenes depict the rift between those in charge and the common man.

2)  The main arc of this film shows a man who is clearly a victim of war.  Yuri Zhivago is a man, who through war and conflict, is torn from his future and family.  At the beginning of the film, Zhivago is a young, virile man with all the potential in the world.  When put through the trials of war and the rise of the Red Army, he is beaten and torn apart, leaving him dead and alone by the end of the film.

3)  I do believe that this film gives us all the pleasures of the cinematic experience.  For example, early in the film, we see the funeral of young Yuri's mother.  The music swells, flocks of birds fly away, the world moves in slow motion.  Moments like this define this movie.  The epic showdown between the police and Bolsheviks is just another example of the many melodramtic elements of the film. 

4) This film is difficult because the enemy force changes throughout the film.  In the opening act we see an oppressive upper-class and government.  As the film carries on and the revolutionaries take power, they become corrupted and oppressive.  While both enemies do comit atrocities in the film, there's never a moment where I felt that it was overly exaggerated.  I feel that the enemy force was treated pretty neutral in this film.

A Very Long Engagement (2004) by Christiane Butler

Title/Year - A Very Long Engagement, 2004

Director/Birth Country/Year Born - Jean-Pierre Jeunet - France - 1953Budget - $56.6 MillionGross - 90.1 Million (Worldwide)Synopsis - A young French woman with polio searches for her fiancé who was drafted into the war.Narrative and Visual Keywords - Flash back, detective, letters, melodrama, long-lost-love.Political/ Social Commentary – War is bad, soldiers went to extremes to get out of fighting.Historical Relevance/ Recognition – The battle of the SommeNotable Collaboration – Director had worked with Audrey Tautou in Amelie, 2001, the music composer Angelo Badalamenti in City of Lost Children, and Dominique Pinon in City of Lost Children, 1995

1. Yes, the high ranked officer is relaxing in a bathtub or having his way with women in every scene we see him in. He purposefully gets an order to release some infantry men wet (Messing up the writing & making it illegible) just so he doesn’t have to follow the order.

2. The soldiers are mostly victims in this movie. Almost none chose to be there, and the main soldier character all chose to mutilate them selves in an attempt to get sent home.

3. Yes, it has a very strong romantic feel. While there are scenes that are not romantic, the whole purpose of the plot is romantic. The main male character, her fiancé who was sent to war, is scene carving notes about their future marriage on trees in the battle field.

4. We don’t really see a whole lot of the enemy, there is one scene in which we see the sister of a German who was at the same battle and she feels the plight of the main character and tries to assist her with some knowledge she has of what happened at the battle.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0344510/

http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=verylongengagement.htm

http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20041216/REVIEWS/41201006/1023

Gallipoli by Mike Mitchell

Title/Year : Gallipoli/1981
Director/Birth Country/Year Born: Peter Weir/Australia/1944
Budget: $2.6 million
Gross: $11,740,000 Australian 
Synopsis: Two Australian sprinters become friends and join the Australian Imperial Force expecting to travel the world and fight for their country but are soon exposed to the truth about war.
Political/ Social Commentary: Attitude of Australians toward the British, the importance of bringing the fight to the enemy so the fight doesn't come to them.
Narrative and Visual Keywords: Running, sand, horse riding, friendship, heritage, Egypt, pro-war
Main Character/Arc: Archy Hamilton/Frank Dunne. Archy is cheerful and passionate about serving his country, so much so that he volunteers Frank as the message runner so he can be on the front line. Frank starts out as a cynic who has no interest in getting involved in the war but Archy eventually convinces him to enlist.
Notable Collaboration: Writer David Williamson makes a cameo as one of the football players in Egypt. 
Historical relevance/recognition:  At the time was the most expensive Australian film ever produced, but payed off as it helped elevate the reputation of the Australian film industry. It was a spring board for Mel Gibson's international career.
Etc.: Due to the popularity of the Gallipoli battlefields as a tourist destination, this film is shown nightly in a number of hostels and hotels in several towns on the peninsula. 

1. Evidence of ineffective military leadership shows up on the day the Light Horse are to charge the Nek as a diversion for the British to land at Suvla Bay. They planned to have an artillery bombardment at 4:30 AM take out the Turkish machine gunners but the commanders watches become unsynchronized and it ends several minutes before it's supposed to. Colonel Robinson wants to proceed with the plan and the first wave gets mowed down like a hot knife through butter by the machine gunners. Major Barton realizes this and advises Robinson to stop sending their men to their deaths but someone told Robinson they saw a marker in the Turkish trenches so he doesn't listen and throws more bodies at the gunners. When the phone lines go down Frank is the only voice of reason left, which nobody listens to, so he rushes to General Gardner's camp on the beach. Gardner tells Frank he is reconsidering the plan and Frank bolts back to the trenches but is just seconds too late to stop Robinson from sending out a third wave of bringing-a-knife-to-a-gunfight soldiers whom Archy is among.

2. Most of the characters we actually get to know at all have some sort of sense of honor and/or duty that are pretty strong up through the charge at the Nek. Archy primarily is compelled to join mostly out of the sense of needing to become a man by serving his country. Others, however less noble they may be, still appear to operate by such a code.

3. All the scenes at the training camp in Egypt seemed to be kind of over exaggerated to me. Even during the training exercises there were a lot of people laughing and looking like they were having fun, Archy and Frank seem perpetually drunk and all our main characters seem to do is walk around Cairo looking for trouble. Although this does serve to really drive home the tonal shift when they are all sent out to the trenches for real.

4. Both the Germans and the Turkish are alluded to being pretty terrible but once we actually encounter the Turkish they don't seem like that much of a threat. Sure, they have big guns and some higher ground but that's about it really. A few of them are even seen playing a target practice game with some of the AIF guys.

Doctor Zhivago (1965) By Andrew Barrick

Title/Year: Doctor Zhivago (1965)

Director/Birth Country/Year Born: David Lean/England/1908

Budget: $11 Million

Gross: $111,721,910

Synopsis: A Russian doctor falls in love with a political activist, all be it with they are both married, during the Bolshevik revolution of the early 20th Century. The doctors half brother searches to locate what might be his long lost niece.

Narrative and Visual Keywords:WWI, WWII, Epics, Russian, Hero, Love, Politics.

Character Arc: A film of love, passion and discovery during the time of war in the first half of the 20th Century. The film follows Yuri Zhivago from his orphaned youth to his love lorn death. Zhivago must do what his heart tells him to choose what he considers the right morale part for himself and his country.

Camera/lighting/editing technique: Long takes, widescreen format, dialogue driven scenes.

Political/ Social Commentary: An adulterous love triangle set to the background of the Bolshevik Revolution. Morality of the upper and lower social classes.

Historical Relevance/ Recognition: Won 5 Academy Awards. (Art Direction, Cinematography Adapted Screenplay, Costume Design, Original Score). Costume design heavily influenced nineteen-sixties apparel design and fashion.

Notable Collaboration: Director David Lean worked with actor Alec Guinness six times during their careers. These films included: Great Expectations, Oliver Twist, The Bridge on the River Kwai, Lawrence of Arabia, Doctor Zhivago, A Passage to India)

Random fact, Etc.: Doctor Zhivago adjusted for inflation is the 8th highest grossing film in the United States.

Sources Cites:
http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=doctorzhivago.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doctor_Zhivago_%28film%29

Responce Questions:

1) Doctor Zhivago is full of elements of social class differences. In the film the Labour Party can be seen in a "peaceful" march, until they are brutally attacked by the Imperial Army guards, riding upon horseback, with swords drawn. Before this attack upon the innocent citizens, they marchers are seen singing in unison out in the cold, meanwhile the upper-class people are parting inside a warm, expensive restaurant. This clearly shows a division between the social classes.

2) One character in particular Pasha Antipov a representative of the Labour Party, whom later becomes Strelnikov a Red Army Commander, is seen as having characteristic of, literally, the wounded solider, and that of a strong individual with a high moral code. He is one one that whole heartedly believes that the power should belong to the people.

3) There were a number of melodramatic elements to Doctor Zhivago. Being a David Lean film what can expect just that. High character development, majestic epic scenes, and high tension elements. In the case of Doctor Zhivago, it is sometimes what isn't said verbally by a character but what is said through a characters facial expressions and mannerisms. A number of times the viewing audience only sees the expression on Yuri Zhivago's face, the emotion is clearly displayed through Omar Sharif's acting abilities.

4) The enemies portrayed in the film were seen more from a neutral eye. Whether it was the Labour Party or the Imperial Russian Army, they were seen from an objective viewpoint. Both parties involved were inclined to violent tendencies in general. Another "enemy" characterized in the film was that of "Morality". Here are main characters (Yuri, Lara, Victor) must choose what they feel is morally appropriate considering their situation.

Gallipoli(1981)- By Carol Ostling

Title/Year : Gallipoli, 1981
Director/Birth Country/Year Born: Peter Weir, Australia, 1944
Budget: 2.6million 
Gross: $11,740,000(Australia); $5,732,587(USA);$2,854,00(1981 rental in USA and UK)
Synopsis: Two Australian sprinters become soldiers in World War I and are shipped to the Galliopli Campaign. 

Camera/Lighting/ and Editing Technique: Most memorable was the shaky camera whenever there was gunfight or a near by explosion. This was also used to help divert your eyes from some of the mistakes that they made with the guns, such as using rusty guns. There was also a lot of pans and following the movement of the character instead of cutting to. It felt like the takes were a lot longer then a modern day US film. Mostly outdoor/practical lighting. Editing felt like a " hide the edit" version, and would often edit for reaction shots and change of scene. Simple yet effective is what I mostly saw.

Political/ Social Commentary: Mateship(friendship); The attitudes towards war specifically the English and the Australians; Pro-War and Anti-War
Narrative and Visual Keywords: Desert, Running, Australian, mateship, Gallipoli Campaign, Athletes, Death, WWI, Breakdown of command, needless death, coming of age
Main Character/Arc: Archy Hamilton(Mark Lee), Frank Dunne(Mel Gibson) two mates who join the army together and get shipped to the Gallipoli Campaign.

 Notable Collaboration: David Williamson one of Australia’s most well known playwright's. He wrote the screen play for Gallipoli. Brian May, composer and award winner at the Australian Film Institute for best original score for Mad Max. Produced by R&R films, Rupert Murdoch’s father was a journalist during WWI. The other R of R&R is Robert Stigwood best known for the management of Bee Gees and the theatrical productions of Hair, Jesus Christ Superstar and Evita(1980 Tony Award for best Musical). Also known  for Grease and Saturday Night Fever.
Historical relevance/recognition:  It took three years to obtain the funds for the film because the government film agency said it was “not commercial”. While the movie did well in Australia when it was brought to the USA the opening weekend only grossed $59,757. After the opening weekend in the USA it quickly gained support and went on to be nominated for a Golden Globe for best Foreign film. Gallipoli helped propel the international career of Mel Gibson. Because of the movies popularity Gallipoli is shown each night in Dardanelles(the battlefield of the campaign and now tourist attraction) in many hotels and hostels. This movie also has historical relevance because it depicts the Gallipoli Campaign and the break down of command that helped become on of the most successful wins for the Turkish Military. Gallipoli Campaign is said to be “ considered to mark the birth of  national consciousness in both of these countries” .
Etc. Archy Hamilton’s character was inspired by a line in the book Official History of Australia in the War of 1914-1918:

                “Wilfred… was last seen running forward like a schoolboy in a foot-race, with all the speed he could compass” .
 

Sources: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gallipoli_(1981_film)#Box_office

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0082432/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gallipoli_Campaign

http://www.anzacsite.gov.au/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Williamson

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brian_May_(composer)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Stigwood

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Weir

Reaction answers:

1) The evidence of the ineffective leadership was a primary concept in the second half of the movie. There was lack of communication between the battle front and the Brigade Commander causing lots of death and the failure of a mission. The social class differential was most pronounced in a scene were Archie and Dunne where going to a ball. However, this was an officer’s ball. In order for Dunne to party with his friend he had lie to a man. All the while their commanding officer saw what was going on and requested that Archie make his friend leave.  Not until the commander office got notice to go to the front was Dunne allowed to stay.  

     2)The solider of duty and honor was most seen throughout the movie. Archie was portrayed as the boy who is man who believes that it is everyman’s duty to fight for their country in a time of war. Most of the movie Archie seems to almost be trying to convince Dunne to fight for duty and honor, even when Dunne has signed up. It wasn’t until some of his mates died before he found his duty to fight. He needed to fight to save his friends, and his fight was in running.  

3)Some of the melodramatic poses were when people died. There was also at the very end when Archie died, that seemed like the most melodramatic moment in the movie.

    4)The enemy was shown as more neutral then brutal. The Australians even were playing shooting games with some of the Turks on the front lines. Everyone was laughing and having fun. When the Turks were sending cannon fire, amazingly we saw no one die from cannon fire. 

Lawrence of Arabia (1962) By Aaron Charny

Title/Year: Lawrence of Arabia, 1962

Director/Birth Country/Year Born: David Lean, England, B. 1908

Budget: $15,000,000 (estimated)
Gross: $70,000,000 (Worldwide) (January 2002)
Synopsis: During WWI British officer Lawrence is sent to Arabia to find Prince Feisal. While in Arabia, Lawrence helps unite hostile Arab tribes to strike back against the Turks.

Narrative and Visual Keywords: WWI, Classic, Epic, Biographies, British, Arabs, War, Hero, Revolts, Fights for freedom. 

Characterization/ Dialogue: T.E. Lawrence (Peter O'Toole), an officer in the British army serving in the Middle East during World War I. He is ordered to enter the desert and make contact with Prince Feisel (Alec Guiness), who is a British ally in the fight against Turkey. What follows is not only an account of how Lawrence became a pivotal figure in the Arab revolt, but his rise and fall of his character during the war. 

Camera/Lighting/Editing technique: Long takes, shots vary from extreme long shots to extreme close ups to stress a point. Tight pacing, there's plenty of action and adventure spread with character development, plot exposure, and visuals. 

Political/ Social Commentary: The British purpose in Arabia was to kick to the Turks out and occupy Arabia on its own. Lawrence purpose was to kick the Turks out, so that the Arabs can be free in their own land. 

Historical Relevance/ Recognition: Lawrence of Arabia was nominated for ten Academy Awards and won seven including Best Picture, Best Director, Best Art Direction and Best Original Score. Upon its release, the film was a huge critical and financial success and it continues to remain popular among viewers and critics alike. The visuals, the dramatic music and the screenplay have all been common points of acclaim and the film as a whole is widely considered one of the greatest films ever made. Its visual style has influenced many directors including George Lucas, Martin Scorsese and Steven Spielberg, who called the film a "miracle".

Notable Collaboration: Alec Guinness, who plays Prince Feisal in Lawrence of Arabia, has appeared in six David Lean movies including Great Expectations (1946), Oliver Twist (1948), The Bridge on the River Kwai (1957) and David Leans last film A Passage to India (1984). Lean once stated that Guinness is his favorite actor.

Random Fact, Etc,: Although 227 minutes long, this film has no women in speaking roles. It is reportedly the longest film not to have any dialog spoken by a woman. 

Sources: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0056172/

                http://www.top10films.co.uk/archives/3244

                http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawrence_of_Arabia_(film)

Reaction answers:

1. I didn’t see any evidence of ineffective military leadership. Lawrence character develops from being controversial soldier with an awkward sense of humor to a hero and is considered as a prophet to some of the Arabian people. As Lawrence witnesses the War and realizes that killing is not the correct solution. He states that he will no longer return to the desert and is being sent home realizing that he has not made any difference to the Arabs. 

2. The film portrays soldiers as strong individuals following code of honor and duty. The battle scenes show both sides dieing and getting wounded, but we never stay on this shot for very long. Except towards the end of the film when Lawrence visits the hospital and finds hundreds of wounded Turks. They are portrayed as suffering victims of war. Lawrence realizes that his efforts in this war have wounded hundreds of people. 

3. No melodrama, but we do get the familiar pleasures of cinema with our hero character fighting for the right cause. The epic scenes and the striking visuals of the hot dessert and dramatic music enhance the enjoyment of this classic firm.

4. The enemy is portrayed as neutral. We don’t see much of the enemy until they catch Lawrence. We see the enemy torturing Lawrence, but we expect that because in the earlier part of the film some characters prepare us for it.