Wednesday, August 15, 2012

Dr. Stranglove or: how i learned to stop worrying and love the bomb By Kevin Fisk, Zachary Van Buuren, Sung Jin In



In a day when everyone was living in constant paranoia, and nerves were being tested by the possibility of nuclear war, I admire how Stanley Kubrick’s Dr. Strangelove took a lighthearted stab at what seemed like such a serious issue at the time.  Kubrick uses comedy, suspense and a lot of symbolism to help contribute to the overall theme of the film.  During the opening credits, the audience is treated to a B-2 bomber being refueled mid flight to a fifties lovemaking instrumental.  This, bookended with a bevy of nuclear explosions at the end, is a telling sign.  More symbolism of this sexual nature exists throughout the film in the form of cigars, machine guns, and even a cowboy fighter pilot who rides an atomic bomb between his legs all the way to the ground. Kubrick uses these symbols to show the ridiculous nature of war room politics as well as spotlight the masculine overtones of battle.  Kubrick decided that humor was the most effective way to portray his view of the existential fatalistic view of the nuclear threat of the 1950's. 
The plot originally came from the book Red Alert written by Peter George.  Kubric loved the book, but also thought documentary or drama on a threatening subject like nuclear war could have a negative effect on viewers. 
Dr. Strangelove is full of colorful, hard headed but passionate and outrageous characters. The names chosen for these characters, were an obvious attempt at the aforementioned symbolism, and also added to the films comedic effect.  During the first scene we are introduced to two characters who could be described as polar opposites.  Ultra-masculine Airforce General Jack Ripper tells Captain Mandrake, a stuttering flight commander with a broken leg, his decision to destroy Russia with multiple simultaneous nuclear attacks. Throughout the film, Mandrake ignores multiple opportunities to dissuade the maniac Ripper.  He just isn’t masculine enough. In the next scene, there is American President Merklin Muffley.  Muffley is a small, bald man who can’t seem to commit to anything, even when he is told his planes will be attacking sites within Russia in under 25 minutes.  Muffley argues with one of his subordinates, General Buck Turdgeson over how to handle the situation. Muffley then has a hilarious exchange over the phone with the Russian president, where they argued with one another about who was the most sorry out of the two.  The amazing thing is Captain Mandrake, President Muffley and Dr. Strangelove were played by the same actor, Peter Sellers.
The film wasn’t an exact depiction of the government and military, however it probably was a conscious choice by Kubrick to show the contrast between ordinary humans and the qualities of humans who rely on machines and technology to serve the purposes they were programmed for.  The way Kubric portrays the use of technology sticks out in this film with constant scenes that focus on large mechanisms that surrounded these central figures.  Whether it was in the war room or cockpit of the air force plane. Ironically, all communicative devices always failed to serve their purpose except to lead mankind to doomsday. I.E., when the R.A.F officer tried to contact President Mufflin though a public payphone, the destroyed radio on the plane that made it impossible to recall the order. Even if the use of these communicative devices were successful, it often had ridiculous conversation that just strayed the characters from their original purposes (like the conversation between the US President and the Russian Premier). Ultimately technologies can only carry on what they were programmed to, but how they are used, are up to those who are capable of logical thoughts, such as human beings.
The film also does a good job blending genres.  During the war room scene, the war table resembled a massive poker table with the country’s top officials partaking in the action.  The camera shots were slow and methodical, milking the suspense out of every shot.  It was as if Kubrick wanted this scene to seem like a poker match was taking place with the fate of the world in balance.  The theme of impotent leaders of society leading to the earths destruction was so in your face, that I think the level of ambition is quite high.  The entire film was not shot the same way either.  The ground battle scenes had more of a documentary feel, and when the plane was dodging a Russian missile, the cuts were quick. 
Peter Sellers performance as multiple characters in the film adds greatly to the humor element, but detracts from the plausibility of the message of the film. While the message could have been delivered more accurately with a full ensemble cast, it would detract from the greatness of the film as it is. Sellers performance is a quality and charm by itself that is an element that makes the film historically great. 
I enjoyed the film greatly, especially in regards to the time it was made and what was considered to do that was "acceptable" as contemporary cinema. Kubrick's characters and imagery have seeded many homages since the time of the films release. It is a prime example of it's genre. 

No comments:

Post a Comment