Saturday, August 25, 2012

Full Metal Jacket by Christiane Butler


Title/Year: Full Metal Jacket/1987
Director/Birth Country/Year Born: Stanley Kubrick/USA/1928
Budget: $30 Million
Gross: $46.3 Million
Synopsis: We follow a marine through boot camp and experiences during the Tet Offensive during the Vietnam War
Narrative and Visual Keywords: Marines, basic training, PTSD, “thousand yard stare”, journalism
Random Fact Etc.: Based on the book The Short-Timers by Gustav Hasford, who based the book on his own experiences during the Vietnam war.

Is the soldier/veteran depicted as being in control of his destiny? Give examples.
After basic training, he makes the choice to go into journalism. Once he is over in Vietnam he decides that he wants to be in with the action & eventually is allowed to go out to make a story for an infantry group. There he then loses most control of his destiny as he now has to follow this platoon wherever they go.

How are masculinity and patriarchy displayed through the main character(s) -- broken and dissociated or reinstated and productive. Please give examples
The soldiers discuss who knows more and who is better by who has been in the field in combat. Once the main character is out starting his adventure with the platoon he follows he has a joking argument with another marine who basically plays him down because he hasn’t been in the field and seen combat. 

Grave of Fireflies by Christiane Butler



Title/Year: Grave of the Fireflies/1988
Director/Birth Country/Year Born: Isao Takahata/Japan/1935
Budget: Approximately 3.7 million US dollars
Gross: Approximately 5 million US dollars
Synopsis: A young boy tries to survive WWII while taking care of his baby sister in Japan.
Narrative and Visual Keywords: Homeless, fireflies, healthcare, candy drops, hunger.
Political/ Social Commentary: This is very anti-war, it shows a less seen and very depressing side of what happens to Japan during WWII.
Historical Relevance/ Recognition: Based on a novel by a man who lost his own sister. He had blamed himself for her death, she died of malnutrition, something that contributed to Setsuko's death in this film.

Identify the central characters. Which characters are static and which ones are developing? Which characters are flat and which are round?: Seita is a round character, he along with his sister, Setsuko, are the main focuses of the film. We see some of his mother’s friends and his aunt and her family, but only briefly.

What facets of the central character’s personality are revealed by what he chooses or rejects?: Seita is shown to be a very stubborn character. He knows that he can’t take proper care of his sister but refuses to apologize to his aunt so that she will take them back in. In the end that turns out to be a fatal mistake.

Friday, August 24, 2012

Santosh Sivan's The Terrorist (1998) by Mark Zuiderveld


Ayesha Dharker as Malli

Title/Year: The Terrorist, 1998
Director/Birth Country/Year born: Santosh Sivan, India, b. 1964
Budget: over 1 million Indian rupees (INR)
Gross: $140,021 (in USA, 2000) and presumably more worldwide
Synopsis: A 19 year old girl, Malli, is a militarist revolutionary, part of a terrorist organization in Southern India, in the Tamil region. Her older brother was killed in the cause when she was younger. She is appointed a suicide mission in order to assassinate a VIP government leader. Throughout her training, she comes to realize living may be more important than dying.
Narrative/Visual Keywords: suicide bomber, assassination, first person POV, dramatic irony, India, revolutionary, Tamil Tigers, civil unrest, close ups, racking focus, slow shutter speed, flashbacks
Character/Arc: A young staunch revolutionary willing to sacrifice her life for a cause looks inside of herself for life's true meaning, her pregnancy, which alters her own perspective of her role: to live or die in the name of war.
Political/Social CommentaryThe question of the morality of suicide bombers is the main subject of discussion. The film was inspired from the assassination of Rajiv Gandhi in 1991, who was 9th Prime Minister of India from 1984 to 1989.
Camera/Lighting techniques: Natural lighting, mostly steady camera shots, filmed in real rainy conditions
Historical Relevance/Recognition: The film won awards at the Cinemanila International Film Festival (Manila, Philippines) and at the Sarajevo Film Festival, as well as other nominations, which brought the film international acclaim. Actor John Malkovich redistributed the film in 2000, the film therefore reaching a larger Western audience. In 2005, film critic Roger Ebert added the film to his Great Movies list, writing, "I admire "The Terrorist" because it sidesteps the ideology, the question of which side is right and which side is wrong, the political motives, the tactical reasons and simply says: Here is a young woman who has decided to kill and be killed for a cause. Look in her eyes, listen to her voice, watch her as she lives for a few days, and ask yourself what motivates her, and why. Every time I see the film, I feel a great sadness, that a human imagination could be so limited that it sees its own extinction as a victory."
Notable Collaboration: Santosh Sivan was also cinematographer on the film, as well as co-screenwriter. Ayesha Dharker stars in the role.
Fun Facts: The real assassin was Thenmozhi Rajaratnam, who killed Rajiv Gandhi and 14 others in May 1991. She used a belt bomb. The conflict between the Indian government and the Tamil Tigers (Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam) came about when Rajiv sent peacekeeping forces to the Southern region in order to quell resistance.

POV
From the start of the film the perspective is from a revolutionary's, to fight for prolonging resistance. The film's point of view changes, revealing Malli's shift from a warring soldier to someone questioning her own motives, despite her own leaders' support for her suicide mission. The POV is singular, showing a gradual change in Malli's attitude towards her own mission, thus giving the audience a lesson to learn: that war is optional.

Identity
A young woman whose loyalty to the Indian resistance is questioned when she realizes she's pregnant and that life may be better than death. She's essentially brainwashed by her male compatriots, led to believe that assassinating a government official is a righteous act. The role of gender could enter the discussion, seeing how Malli is a woman who realizes she is pregnant, which may change her attitude towards the mission. However, a man or woman regardless of their gender would be extremist enough to be a suicide bomber. 

Morality
The film may suggest that morality is relative; that to be a killer in the name of a cause is just as right as a choice not to assassinate others by means of a suicide bomb. The film does favor a liberal point of view (that life is a better option), and juxtaposes these political opposites greatly for dramatic effect. Who are we to say that a foreigner's destiny is right or wrong? Should it even matter? Consider Malli's situation, observe her path. She is young, perhaps naive, but firm in her belief in the resistance movement.
Morality is viewed a certain way from other characters. For example, the man who owns the house and property speaks in loose ideologies and parables to Malli. He prays for her suicide mission to go well, indicating a religiously justified association. This may suggest that personal beliefs of the living are more important to themselves, and is blind to the principles of morality.

Memory
Flashbacks play a key role that influence the audience to believe that war is an unkind situation. When Malli is greeted by the little boy on her way to the new campsite, he tells her of his past, that his home village was burned and his family and friends murdered. The memories Malli has of a comrade dying before her eyes indicates that she is more resolute in her revolutionary stance, but this contrasts greatly with her more enlightened view of her role in the world near the end of the film.

http://www.cinela.com/english/month/120203/cinela1202.htm
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0169302/

Wednesday, August 22, 2012

Final Options


War & Cinema: Final Presentation Options


Choose an option below and construct a 10-12 minute presentation, including visuals (either powerpoint with stills or clips from a film you are analyzing).  The response to each option should be at least three paragraphs and posted to the blog – the template is helpful to use when appropriate.

First claim, first serve. You can reserve your show/film/game of choice at the end of class week 7 or email me as soon as you decide. I will be posting taken shows on the blog (on this post under the option), so please check this post before you email me. Certain options have unlimited possibilities – this is to ensure that no one presents the same media twice


You must use three sources, limited to scholarly articles, newspapers or magazine (no on-line reviews or forum quotes). Most option include at least one mandatory source—it is your responsibility to research and find the remaining sources. As always, cite all sources.

Make sure your presentation and clearly presenting an argument or analysis.

Option A:

Television & Violence: Episodic Battle

Read: Television violence and behavior: A research summary and use it to contextualize an episodic television show that revolves around war or battle.
You are free to choose the show but note that no show can be presented twice.

Use the following quote as a jumping point:

 Research...has revealed that violence on television plays an important role in communicating the social order and in leading to perceptions of the world as a mean and dangerous place. Symbolic victimization on television and real world fear among women and minorities, even if contrary to the facts, are highly relate

Please find and deconstruct the social order and symbolic victimization in the series and include a clip or visual to support your argument.

Some suggestions: Band of Brothers, Birdsong, Generation Kill, Game of Thrones, Battlestar Galactia.

Ben H - M*A*S*H
Jake - The Wire

 Option B:

The War Reporter

Read: The depiction of war reporters in Hollywood feature
films from the Vietnam war to the present and use it to frame a film that features a war reporter.

Present a singular film, with a developed war reporter as a character and present them  in relation to the time period the film was made. The essay chronicles a history of this archetype, it is important that the function of the character is presented in its historical context.

Some ideas worth presenting – authenticity, gender issues, journalistic ethics

Some suggestions: The Bedford Incident (1965), We Were Soldiers (2002), The Green Berets ( 1968), The Year of Living Dangerously (1982), Under Fire (1983), Three Kings (1999), War Photographer (2001) – documentary

Bradley Davis - War Photographer

Option C:

Propaganda and Horror Films of the 40’s

Read: OWI Meets the Monsters: Hollywood Horror Films and War Propaganda, 1942 to 1945, and use it to frame a horror film from the 1940’s.

Describe the relationship between OWI and Hollywood, specifically related to the film at hand if possible, and present the most obvious metaphors and symbols deployed.

Keep in mind the distinction between good and evil and the possibility of cold war or anti-communist sentiment. Draw distinction between horror and pathos.

Suggestions: Dead of Night (1945), The Body Snatcher (1945), The Devil Commands, The (1941), The Ghost Breakers (1940), Man Made Monster (1941), Beast with Five Fingers, The (1946), Bedlam (1946), I Walked with a Zombie (1943), The Lady and the Monster (1944), The Picture of Dorian Gray (1945), The Wolf Man (1941)


Option D:

War & Comedy

Choose a particular comedic film and present its simplification of violence or use of satire to reveal truths. Consider the article, The best humour is satire, and there's a reason we have so little of it today

You are required to use professional reviews or articles about your specific film as your remaining sources.

Suggestions: Stripes, The Great Dictator, Hot Shot! Part Deux, Catch-22, Kelly's Heroes, To Be Or Not To Be, Starship Troopers, Bananas

Kerry Kutzer - Catch 22
Christiane Butler - Starship Troopers
Carol Ostling
Aaron Charney - Bananas
Kevin Fisk - Hot Shots

Option E:

Video Games and the Military

Read, Video games gaining clout as military training tools & Adapting video games for military application and present a particular game that promotes engagement with war.

There are two additional sources Video games sub reading 1 & 2 posted on ecompanion that you should read as well.

Create a powerpoint with stills and argue in support or against the use of these games in the military.

The game must contain actual battle or a game cleared for training purposes.

Mike Mitchell - Mass Effect

Option F:

War Comic Books in America

Read, The Dream of Total War and choose a particular war comic and present the clear distinction of good and evil within a historical and social context.

Bryan Tosh - Sgt. Rock

Option G


The Auteur & War Cinema

With Auteur Theory as a base, describe how one of the following directors imprinted their markedly stylistic tendencies in a war film.

Read, The Auteur Theory of Film: Holy or Just Full of Holes? And make a case in support of or suspicion of auteur theory.

 

Must choose from one of the following directors:

Yi Man­hui (article provided) - Taken by Jin
Errol Morris - Taken by Mark
Steven Soderbergh
Akira Kurosawa
David Lean - Taken by Andrew

Option H

Feminism & War 



Read, Feminist folkloristics and women's cinema: Towards a methodology.

“Koven argues that the deciding factor of gendered cinema is not to be found in the biological sex of the director or screenwriter, and that the only way a feminine voice can be heard is by a radical shift in the narrative codes.”

Use this idea as a jumping point to analyze Courage Under Fire, A Few Good Men or G.I Jane.

Homework Week Seven

Any contemporary war film (made in the last 20 years)
Some Suggestions:
The Hurt Locker - Kathryn Bigelow
Three Kings – David O Russell
Empire of the Sun – Steven Spielberg
Inglorious Bastards – Quentin Tarantino
Ride with the Devil  - Ang Lee
The Sun – Aleksandr Sokurov
Black Book – Paul Verhoeven
Courage Under Fire -- Edward Swick

This is your last analysis before your Final Project. Be sure to be thorough and check for spelling/grammar. Complete and template and point out examples of the following: P.O.V., Identity, Morality & Memory. Please separate by heading-- ex. 
P.O.V
blah blah
IDENTITY
blah blah blah

African Queen by Zachary vanBuuren



Title/Year; African Queen/1951

Director/Birth Country/Year Born; John Huston/U.S./1906

Budget; 1.3 million

Gross; 4.3 million

Synopsis; Humphrey Bogart plays Charlie Allnut, captain of a small cargo ship named the African Queen that delivers mail and supplies to villages and christian missionaries along the river in then unoccupied but German controlled east Africa in 1914 during the onset of WW1. Allnut informers Miss Rose Sayer, played by Katharine Hepburn that the Germans are eradicating the populace. On a return trip a few days later, Allut finds the village destroyed and Miss Sayer burying her dead brother. They set down the river back to civilization together and Miss Sayer is rather perturbed by the drunken, filthy lifestyle lived by riverboat captain Allnut. Allnut attempts to become a gentleman and eventually Miss Sayer is charmed by Bogart’s performance. She convinces him to turn his small steamboat into a warship by constructing rudimentary torpedoes and mounting them of the bow of the Queen so they can attempt to engage a large German warship in battle that protects the lake. Allnut begrudgingly agrees and they make their way past crocodile and leech infested waters, treacherous rapids, and a near call with a German military outpost while developing romantic reliance upon each other. At the mouth of the river, the boat gets lost in the delta and the couple nearly dies from fever and dehydration. A flash rainstorm creates a swell of water and it pushes them into the large lake. The Queen is rolled over on the attack run, Sayer and Allnut are picked up by the Germans. During the questioning the German gunship accidentally runs into the wrecked African Queen, the torpedoes blow a hole in the ship, And the river weary couple rejoice having done their godly duty.

Narrative and Visual Keywords; Charming, Proper, Christian, Rugged.

Characterization/ Dialogue; Bogart plays a drunk Englishman, while Hepburn plays a very (christian) proper lady of the time. The dialogue is very simple, but effective.

Camera/lighting/editing technique; Technicolor. Flat visuals. Digestible.

Political/ Social Commentary; Portrayal of Germans as warrish brutes.


Historical Relevance/ Recognition; The ships and technology were researched and portrayed correctly.  

Notable Collaboration; Bogart and Huston.


Random fact, Etc; The script had to be re-written for Bogart as he was incapable of producing a cockney accent well enough.


1. Did you find any evidence of ineffective military leadership (associated with upper-class ineptitude) that is compensated for through hard work and commitment of the lowly infantryman? Any scene where difference in social class is evident? Describe the dynamic or scene in which this theme is portrayed.
~In the final scene where Bogart and Hepburn are captured by the Germans, the commander is loud and garish. There is a lack of military respect present on the German gunship.
2. Does the film show a suffering soldier as a victim of war rather than exposing the structure of violence and presenting soldiers as elements in it? Or does it portray the soldier as a strong individual following codes of honor and duty How does the film achieve this point of view?
~The film only has passing shots of soldiers running around doing the commands barked at them by their superiors. They are just peons at the whim of the officers. 
3. Does the film offer the audience the familiar pleasures of cinema – the romantic scenarios and melodramatic poses woven into a more direct and immediate sense of war? What elements of spectacle in the story (battle scenes or otherwise) achieve a sense of melodrama? 
~This film is primarily a romantic Hollywood story featuring a man and woman falling in love while battling adversities. They are dealing with elements of the war being an antagonistic force, but it is an equal battle to fight their way through the wilderness. The climactic ending of the film sends the message that love conquers all, war be dammed.
4. Is the enemy portrayed as neutral or through hysterical exaggerations of atrocity? 
~The Germans are just "the enemy" but it is never elaborated why. this makes them very neutral.